Next: Papers at Meteorological Conferences
Up: Research Publications
Previous: Journals
Subsections
These papers are typically written from a machine intelligence
or information-processing view point and are strong on technique,
but only glance upon results, motivations and underlying
scientific ideas.
In (13), we describe how radar data is transmitted, compressed and archived.
We note that although
custom compression techniques have been devised for radar data that
outperform generic techniques, radar operations groups
ultimately use off-the-shelf solutions.
We also point out that
the underlying ideas behind compressibity are useful beyond
just reducing the amount of data for transmission and archival. The
compressibility of radar data has been found useful for devising
quality control algorithms, especially for the detection and removal
of test patterns.
[ read (pdf) online ].
[ presentation slides (ppt) ].
In (14), we describe how to create good probabilistic forecasts
when the entity to be forecast can move and morph.
The technique involves clustering Doppler radar-derived fields such as
low-level shear and reflectivity to form candidate regions.
Assuming stationarity, the spatial probability
distribution of the regions is estimated, conditioned based on
the level of organization within the regions and combined with the
probability that a candidate region becomes severe.
[ read (pdf) online ].
In (15), we formulate the tornado prediction problem differently.
Instead of devising a machine intelligence approach to classify
detections, we formulate the problem as a spatio-temporal one: of
estimating the probability of a tornado event at a particular spatial
location within a given time window. We also
describe our initial approach to addressing this differently
formulated problem.
[ read (pdf) online ].
Weather radar data is subject to many contaminants, mainly
due to non-precipitating targets (such as insects and
wind-borne particles) and due to anamalous propagation
(AP) or ground clutter. Although weather forecasters
can usually identify, and account for, the presence of such
contamination, automated weather algorithms are affected
drastically. We discuss several local texture features
and image processing steps that can be used to discriminate
some of these types of contaminants.
None of these features by themselves can discriminate
between precipitating and non-precipitating areas.
A neural network is used for this purpose. We discuss
training this neural network using a million-point data
set, and accounting for the fact that even this data set
is necessarily incomplete (16).
[ read (pdf) online ].
[ read (powerpoint) online ].
A multistep method of partioning the pixels of an image such that the partitions
at one step are wholly nested inside the partitions of the next step is described,
i.e. we describe an agglomerative, hierarchical segmentation technique that
uses texture information to perform the segmentation (17).
The image is requantized using K-Means clustering. Then, clusters are expanded
using region growing and morphological processing. This provides the most
detailed level of segmentation. The next coarser segmentation levels are
obtained by steadily relaxing the intercluster distance between the clusters
that is allowed by the morphological processing.
Results are demonstrated on real-world images and swathes of
Brodatz textures.
[ read (pdf) online ].
This paper, in the International Conference on Image Processing
(ICIP 2000) (18),
describes a method of segmenting satellite weather images
using a Kolmogorov-Smirnov test on the distribution of local texture
within an image.
[ read (pdf) online ].
In (19), you will find
a description of problems associated with detecting rare signatures.
I describe various skill measures and list some of the
genetic algorithm and fuzzy
classifier modifications that need to be made to handle rare
signature detection.
[ read (html) online ].
At Annie (20),
we discussed the limitations of classification done by thresholding a
weighted sum and introduced a fuzzy logic classifier, comparing its
performance with that of the weighted-sum thresholder used
in (21).
[read online]
At the IAPR, (22) and (21)
we described a fuzzy logic approach where the various
uncertainties associated with a BWER's radar profile (capping,
three-dimensional structure, vertical height, reflectivity ranges,
proximity to a mesocyclone, etc.) are taken into account.
[ read (html) online ].
The fuzzy aggregration operators in the general literature can not
handle cases where the categories are disproportionately distributed.
This paper (23) describes
a fuzzy aggregation operator that works in aggregating
disproportionate classes.
[ read (html) online ].
Next: Papers at Meteorological Conferences
Up: Research Publications
Previous: Journals
V. Lakshmanan : valliappa.lakshmanan@noaa.gov